Reading guide
Use competing scenarios to examine future warfare, great-power risk, covert competition, and long cycles of power. Scenarios are tools for questioning assumptions, not predictions to accept uncritically.
Begin with the changing character of warfare, then examine China risk, Russian intelligence, and the longer economic cycles behind strategic change.
Use this suggested order as a starting point, or choose the book that interests you most.
Read 1
Brose moves from criticism to a call for urgency and innovation. That is what I value here: a connection between emerging digital technologies and the practical demands of national defense, including the institutions that must adapt.
Explore this book →Read 2
Brands and Beckley bring earlier China themes together around a difficult proposition: a narrowing window of opportunity could increase the risk of conflict. Their clear synthesis is useful for examining that argument, without treating a forecast as an inevitable outcome.
Explore this book →Read 3
Hardware and armies are only part of the picture. Devine brings narrative, perception, and covert influence into the discussion, making this a useful companion to The Kill Chain and Danger Zone.
Explore this book →Read 4
Dalio’s recurring patterns offer a way to think about structural instability across countries and centuries. I find that lens useful while leaving room to disagree with his conclusions about where those patterns lead.
Explore this book →Read 5
An advantage matters in relation to how others respond. The Dragons and the Snakes keeps adaptation at the center of strategic thinking, rather than assuming an advantage will last.
Explore this book →Read 6
New technology places demands on people and institutions as well as equipment. War Transformed connects those demands with the practical question of using new capabilities well.
Explore this book →Read 7
Strategic speculation needs a historical check. The Twilight War supplies a record of actual decisions and unintended consequences against which to consider the forecasts elsewhere in the guide.
Explore this book →Optional companions that extend or challenge the core sequence.
Historical perspective is useful when strategic debate becomes absorbed in what comes next. The Coming Storm connects the historical foundations selections with the questions of power and conflict in Strategic Futures.
Explore this book →Contemporary reporting brings a different kind of pressure to the strategic scenarios in this guide. Peter Apps’s perspective on conflict and risk is a useful way to return those discussions to events and decisions in the world.
Explore this book →Deterrence looks different when you follow the decisions that could lead to catastrophe. Jacobsen’s scenario sharpens the questions about escalation and the limits of strategic confidence raised elsewhere in this collection.
Explore this book →Set this beside Nuclear War to compare two forms of catastrophic risk. The biological scenario broadens the national-security discussion and the questions we should ask about emerging threats.
Explore this book →Intelligence decisions have consequences that outlast the moment in which they are made. Ghost Wars connects the strategic questions in this guide with the earlier history behind the Afghanistan accounts in the Elliot Ackerman collection.
Explore this book →Community and resilience give this account of catastrophe its place in the guide. Set it beside Nuclear War to compare a fictional struggle to survive with a contemporary escalation scenario.
Explore this book →
